Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
August 1, 2025Open Access

Rewriting the Politics of Publication: Tracking 25 Years of Debate in Academic Reform with Bibliometric Analysis

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

TWTarid WongvorachanSNSuchada Naknarin

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Bibliometric analysis identifies key trends in academic publishing challenges, suggesting shifts in discourse on equity and integrity.

Key Points

  • MAIN FINDING: The analysis reveals evolving debates on academic publishing reform over the past 25 years.
  • KEY EVIDENCE: Significant themes include editorial gatekeeping and the impact of prestige-driven evaluation metrics.
  • APPROACH: A three-fold bibliometric analysis of literature from 2000 to 2025 using structured searches in Scopus.
  • SIGNIFICANCE: This work informs future reforms, promoting a more equitable and transparent academic publishing landscape.

Cite This Study

Wongvorachan et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/689a0c65e6551bb0af8cfb8dhttps://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202507.2644.v1
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Misalignment of Incentives in Academic Publishing and Implications for Journal Reform2024 · 7 citations
  2. 2Digital publishing and open access in Library and Information Science (2020–2025): A bibliometric and science-mapping analysis2026
  3. 3Reframing Scholarly Communication in the Digital Era: Open Access, Research Integrity, and the Evolving Role of Academic Journals2025
  4. 4Unveiling scientific integrity in scholarly publications: a bibliometric approach2024 · 9 citations
  5. 5Taming the wild West: a systematic review and evaluation of bibliometric reviews of educational research2026 · 1 citations