Retrospective cohort study shows COVID-19 vaccination reduces mortality rate and lower limb amputation in patients with peripheral vascular disease, suggesting vaccine's protective effects.
Backgound: Unvaccinated individuals with peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) are more likely to develop acute limb ischemia (ALI) following COVID-19 infection. Our assessed the protective effect of the COVID-19 vaccine in preventing ALI in PAOD patients with COVID-19 infection. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted using the US TriNetX (Cambridge, MA), patients with PAOD who were diagnosed with COVID-19 between November 1, 2020, and December 31, 2023, were identified as the study population. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for demographic variables, lifestyle factors, medical utilization, and comorbidities. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare the two matched cohorts. Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated the 3-year cumulative probability of lower limb amputation incidence. We selected 12,948 PAOD patients who received the COVID-19 vaccine and 44,064 PAOD patients who were unvaccinated against COVID-19. Results: Total of 11,822 pairs of PAOD patients with and without COVID-19 vaccination were compared. The mean (SD) age was 66.5 (14.1) years; there were 4849 male patients (41%) and 6569 female (55.6%) compared to unvaccinated PAOD patients, those who received the COVID-19 vaccine had a significantly lower risk of 3-year all-cause mortality (log-rank test, p < 0.001, hazard ratios (HRs) were 0.857; 95% CI, 0.796–0.922) and lower limb amputation (log-rank test, p = 0.001, HR=0.716; 95% CI, 0.587–0.873), though there was no significant difference in ischemic stroke (log-rank test, p = 0.174, HR=0.958, 95% CI, 0.902–1.019). Conclusions: This study found that Patients who received the COVID-19 vaccine had a significantly lower risk of 3-year all-cause mortality and lower limb amputation, though there was no significant difference in ischemic stroke.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Su et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: