Realist review examines how xr immersive technologies enhance patient outcomes in clinical skills and simulation education, indicating areas for growth.
Background The paper aims to examine circumstances that lead to improvement of patient outcomes by contribution of XR immersive technologies in clinical skills and simulation-based education. The realist approach that is fundamentally concerned with theory development and refinement of complex interventions is adopted to enable development of new knowledge and highlight success and areas of development [1-3]. Methods/ Design Quality guidance and checklist of ‘RAMESES’ (Realist and meta-review Evidence Synthesis: Evolving Standards) were used to gain an understanding of the different contexts of how interventions worked. A realist review included secondary data analysis using a database search of MEDLINE, CINAHL, BNI, EMBASE, PubMed and Google Scholar. Main terms used were ‘digital technology’ ‘XR in Healthcare/Extended Reality’ and their related synonyms. Once key data were extracted realist analysis was undertaken to identify impact of context and underlying causal mechanisms that can lead to different outcomes. Realist and meta-narrative review approaches are relatively new approaches to systematic review and are theory driven, guiding the process from the beginning, with data extraction and synthesis being key aspects of theory refinement [4]. Much of the focus being on interactions between interventions, Context (C), Mechanism (M) and Outcomes (O) configuration, aim to identify patterns and refine the theory. Results Literature search initially provided 179 inclusion-relevant papers. 37 studies that were primarily focused on research-related immersive experiences were chosen for data extraction. Context of emerging technologies in selected studies included: • Virtual Reality (VR) • Augmented Reality (AR) • Mixed Reality (MR) • Extended Reality (XR) These were then themed through connections and chains of inference into the following categories: • Skills • Knowledge • Quality • Personal Characteristics • Learner Experiences • Cost-Benefit & Justification • Patient Safety • Affective Outcomes The above approaches enabled narrative development to generate new knowledge and identified best applications of XR immersive technologies in clinical skills training and simulation-based education to enhance timely, technology assisted appropriate and cost effective learning to improve patient outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rebecca Delpino (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: