Case report discusses radiotherapy outcomes in postoperative management of malignant phyllodes tumor, highlighting treatment strategies.
Phyllodes tumor of the breast (PTB) is a rare fibroepithelial neoplasm with controversial postoperative management, particularly for borderline and malignant subtypes. Limited large-scale studies exist on optimal radiotherapy strategies and recurrence prevention, necessitating further exploration of multidisciplinary approaches. A 50-year-old female presented with a rapidly enlarging right breast mass (from 2 to 3 cm to 12 cm within a week), initially detected 10 years prior. Imaging revealed a BI-RADS 4B cystic-solid lesion, and biopsy confirmed a malignant neoplasm with necrosis. Postmastectomy pathology confirmed a malignant PTB (T4N0M0GX) with stromal overgrowth, adipose tissue invasion, and high Ki-67 (90%+). Immunohistochemistry showed Vimentin+, CK+, and BCL2+, while ER/PR were negative. The patient underwent right mastectomy followed by adjuvant radiotherapy targeting the tumor bed (gross tumor volume tumor bed: 60 Gy/25F) and expanded margins (planning tumor volume: 50 Gy/25F). No chemotherapy or endocrine therapy was administered due to limited evidence of efficacy. Postoperative recovery was uneventful, with no local recurrence observed during follow-up. Radiotherapy achieved optimal local control, aligning with studies suggesting reduced recurrence in margin-challenged cases. This case provides critical clinical evidence supporting adjuvant radiotherapy as a viable salvage strategy for malignant PTB with close/positive margins (≤1 cm), particularly when re-excision is contraindicated. By demonstrating 12-month disease-free survival with acceptable toxicity, our findings directly address the NCCN guideline gap regarding postmastectomy radiation for borderline resectable PTB. The documented multidisciplinary decision-making process - incorporating tumor biology (high Ki-67), anatomical constraints, and patient preferences - offers a replicable framework for similar cases while underscoring the urgent need for consensus protocols through prospective registry studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ran et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: