Research demonstrates corrective sub-movements enhance feedforward learning in mice, suggesting feedback impacts anticipatory motor control.
The ability to execute accurate movements is thought to rely on both anticipatory feedforward commands and rapid feedback corrections, yet how these control systems are integrated within cerebellar circuits remains unclear. Here, we show that corrective sub-movements (CSMs) - structured, feedback-driven adjustments occurring spontaneously during naturalistic mouse reaching - are not only encoded in anterior interposed (IntA) output neurons, but also act as instructive signals for feedforward learning. Closed-loop perturbations that trigger CSMs lead to learned shifts in the timing of future corrections, even in the absence of further perturbation. Strikingly, this learning depends on the timing of corrective responses, rather than the timing of the error itself, and is accompanied by physiological adaptation in cerebellar output neuronal firing rates. These findings reveal a cerebellar mechanism by which feedback responses train future anticipatory control signals, bridging the gap between reactive and anticipatory motor control in the cerebellum. Mice generate rapid, precise corrective sub-movements (CSMs) during reach that counter both spontaneous variability and induced errorsCerebellar output neurons encode both predictive and corrective movements, mechanistically linking feedforward and feedback controlClosed-loop optogenetic disruption of cerebellar output induced reach errors that were entirely compensated by CSMsLearning was driven by the timing of corrective responses, not the timing of the initial error, suggesting an instructive role for CSMsBoth reach kinematics and cerebellar nuclear activity adapted over trials of repeated perturbationOptogenetic activation of cerebellar output drove errors and subsequent learning, but also blocked expression of that learning acutely, pinpointing cerebellar output as a key site of motor learning expressionFindings suggest a neural mechanism by which feedback corrections influence learning of feedforward control policies in cerebellar circuits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dobrott et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: