Machine learning demonstrates accurate predictions of hepatocellular carcinoma risk in cirrhosis patients treated with antiviral therapy, highlighting its utility in clinical settings.
Abstract BackgroundThere were few prediction models specifically designed to evaluate the hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk in chronic hepatitis B patients with cirrhosis. This study aimed to develop a machine learning-based prediction model to assess the risk of HCC in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related cirrhosis undergoing nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) therapy.MethodsThis study included 1,592 patients with HBV-related cirrhosis who had received entecavir, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, or tenofovir alafenamide for at least one year. Patients developing HCC within 12 months of NA therapy were excluded. Patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio into the derivation or validation group, and the prediction model was developed using the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm. The Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) model was employed to assess each parameter's contribution to prediction accuracy.ResultsThe cumulative HCC incidences in all patients at 5, 8 and 10 years were 15.2%, 22.7%, and 25.7%, respectively. Our ML-HCC model incorporated six parameters: serum albumin and platelet count at treatment initiation, and age, platelet count, aspartate transaminase, and AFP level at 1 year of NA therapy. In the validation group, AUROCs of the ML-HCC model ranged from 0.79 to 0.80 over 3 to 10 years, outperforming extant models including APA-B, PLAN-B, PAGE-B, mPAGE-B, REACH-B, and CU-HCC (AUROCs: 0.61–0.73, p < 0.05). Risk stratification showed 10-year HCC incidences for the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups were 9%, 26%, and 67%, respectively.ConclusionThe proposed machine learning model for predicting HCC development exhibited good predictive performance in patients with HBV-related cirrhosis undergoing NA therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: