Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
August 2, 2025Journal of Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning and Neural Network

Responsible integration of generative artificial intelligence in academic writing: a narrative review and synthesis

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

USUmar SodangiAIAkilu Isma’il

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Narrative review examines risks and ethical concerns of generative AI in academic writing, suggesting institutional responses.

Key Points

  • Integrating generative artificial intelligence in academic writing raises significant risks like plagiarism and citation errors.
  • Ethical integration emphasizes transparency, human oversight, and the meaningful contribution of AI tools to academic writing.
  • Institutional responses vary, with many institutions implementing frameworks to ensure responsible AI use and compliance.
  • Challenges persist in training faculty and clarifying policies for AI's role in academic integrity and research evaluation.

Cite This Study

Sodangi et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/689a0c72e6551bb0af8d03ffhttps://doi.org/10.55529/jaimlnn.52.13.23
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Ethical reflections on the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in the academic sphere: writing and authorship2024 · 7 citations
  2. 2The Impact of AI on Academic Research and Publishing2024 · 4 citations
  3. 3Challenges, Benefits and Recommendations for Using Generative Artificial Intelligence in Academic Writing – A case of ChatGPT2024 · 15 citations
  4. 4Generative AI in Education: Implications for Integrity, Assessment, Literacy, Policy, and Ethics – A Systematic Review2026
  5. 5Between Technical Assistance and Authorship: Researchers’ Ethical considerations of Using Generative AI for Scientific Writing2025 · 1 citations