Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
August 2, 2025

Methodological Advances and Gaps in Urban Green Space and Schoolyard Greening Research: A Critical Review

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

MGMahshid Gorjian

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

This critical review examines methodological developments in urban green space and schoolyard greening, highlighting significant gaps and inconsistencies.

Key Points

  • Major gaps persist in schoolyard greening research despite advances in urban green space methods.
  • Quantitative approaches include hedonic pricing models and machine learning to assess impacts.
  • The review calls for more longitudinal studies and participative methodologies to fill existing research gaps.
  • Promoting social equity and justice is essential for future urban greening and property value studies.

Cite This Study

Mahshid Gorjian (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/689a0c7be6551bb0af8d0526https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/a8ryz_v1
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Green Schoolyard Investments and Urban Equity: A Systematic Review of Economic and Social Impacts Using Spatial-Statistical Methods2025 · 13 citations
  2. 2Value-added Benefits of Green Space: A Systematic Analysis of the Relationship between Urban Green Space and Commercial House Prices in Beijing Based on Remote Sensing Technology2022 · 2 citations
  3. 3The impact of neighborhood services on land values: an estimation through the hedonic pricing model2020 · 33 citations
  4. 4Valuing the Accessibility of Green Spaces in the Housing Market: A Spatial Hedonic Analysis in Shanghai, China2023 · 18 citations
  5. 5Development and testing of the green schoolyard evaluation tool (GSET)2023 · 16 citations