Scoping review identifies limited randomized trials in nutritional psychiatry, suggesting probiotics have modest effects.
BACKGROUND Nutritional psychiatry is a rapidly expanding field of research, with mounting evidence suggesting that nutritional factors may play a role in the development of psychiatric disorders. AIM To examine the level of evidence for nutritional psychiatry. METHODS A scoping review was conducted to assess the current state of nutritional psychiatry, including a search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). RESULTS The review identified a total of seven papers, with many concentrating on the relationship between depression and the gut microbiome. A salient issue that emerged from this review was the paucity of sample size in many studies. The inherent complexity of nutritional studies, characterized by a multitude of potential factors and exposures that often act as confounders, poses significant challenges to the development of effective RCT designs. The analysis revealed that probiotics, though demonstrating efficacy, exhibited a modest effect size. CONCLUSION Conducting RCTs with effective markers is imperative from these studies. The implementation of Mendelian randomization and the investigation of mechanisms in basic research are essential complementary approaches.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takahiko Nagamine (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: