Systematic review finds VR improves fall self-efficacy in Parkinson’s and multiple sclerosis patients, suggesting potential benefits.
Background/Objectives: Falls are recognized as a leading cause of injury, with approximately one in ten incidents resulting in physical injury. Although virtual reality (VR)-based interventions have been explored for fall prevention, systematic reviews and meta-analyses remain limited. This study aimed to assess research trends and evaluate the effectiveness of VR-based fall prevention through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: This review was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was carried out in PubMed, EBMASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), Cochrane Library, and Korean databases from their inception through 31 December 2024. A total of 49 studies met the inclusion criteria, and a meta-analysis was conducted on 37 studies with available data using “R” 4.4.1 software. Effect sizes (ESs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for key outcomes. Results: The VR-based interventions showed a statistically significant positive effect on falls self-efficacy, as measured by the Falls Efficacy Scale (FES) (ES = 0.28, 95% CI: 0.17–0.39, p < 0.001). However, no significant reduction was observed in the number of falls (ES = −0.31, 95% CI: −0.80–0.17, p = 0.20). Subgroup analysis by participant medical condition for the FES revealed the largest effects in the Parkinson’s disease (PD) group (ES = 0.61), followed by the multiple sclerosis (MS) (ES = 0.34), the “other” group (ES = 0.25), and “healthy” participants (ES = 0.24). A statistically significant reduction in the number of falls was observed only in the MS group (ES = −0.56). Conclusions: VR-based interventions are effective in improving falls self-efficacy, particularly among individuals with neurological conditions, such as Parkinson’s disease and multiple sclerosis. However, evidence for a reduction in actual fall incidence remains limited. Further large-scale, long-term studies are needed to evaluate the sustained impact of VR interventions on fall prevention outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: