An adaptive preprocessing strategy reduces visual hallucinations in large language models, implying enhanced factual grounding and trustworthiness.
Abstract Purpose: Visual hallucinations in Large Language Models (LLMs)—where outputs conflict with the visual input—undermine trust and reliability, especially in applications demanding high transparency, factual correctness, and security. While most prior research focuses on post-hoc corrections or model-specific fine-tuning, the potential of input-stage interventions remains underexplored. This study investigates whether preprocessing alone can mitigate hallucinations without modifying model architecture. Methods: We propose an ensemble-based adaptive preprocessing framework that selects the most suitable image filtering strategy—noise-reduced (NR), edge-enhanced (EE), or original (org)—based on the question type. The framework requires no retraining and is model-agnostic. We evaluate our method using the HaloQuest benchmark, which features visually challenging multimodal reasoning tasks. Hallucination levels are assessed using Natural Language Inference (NLI) scores generated via SelfCheckGPT. Results: Our approach achieves a 44.3\% reduction in hallucination rates compared to baseline methods. Notably, this improvement is accomplished without altering the underlying LLM or vision encoder, demonstrating the effectiveness of adaptive preprocessing alone in improving response fidelity. Conclusion: These findings show that intelligent input conditioning can significantly enhance the factual grounding of LLM outputs. Adaptive preprocessing emerges as a lightweight, architecture-agnostic solution for hallucination mitigation, supporting the development of more secure, interpretable, and trustworthy AI systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arif et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: