Automated optimisation improves DBS electrode contact and current selection for Parkinson's disease patients, highlighting better outcomes.
Background Optimisation of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) settings is a key aspect in achieving clinical efficacy in movement disorders, such as the Parkinson’s disease. Modern techniques attempt to solve the problem through data-intensive statistical and machine learning approaches, adding significant overhead to the existing clinical workflows. Here, we present an optimisation approach for DBS electrode contact and current selection, grounded in routinely collected MRI data, well-established tools (Lead-DBS) and, optionally, clinical review records. Methods The pipeline, packaged in a cross-platform tool, uses lead reconstruction data and simulation of volume of tissue activated to estimate the contacts in optimal position relative to the target structure, and suggest optimal stimulation current. The tool then allows further interactive user optimisation of the current settings. Existing electrode contact evaluations can be optionally included in the calculation process for further fine-tuning and adverse effect avoidance. Results Based on a sample of 177 implanted electrode reconstructions from 89 Parkinson’s disease patients, we demonstrate that DBS parameter setting by our algorithm is more effective in covering the target structure (Wilcoxon p<6e-12, Hedges g>0.34) and minimising electric field leakage to neighbouring regions (p<2e-15, g>0.84) compared to expert parameter settings. Conclusion The proposed automated method, for optimisation of the DBS electrode contact and current selection shows promising results and is readily applicable to existing clinical workflows. We demonstrate that the algorithmically selected contacts perform better than manual selections according to electric field calculations, allowing for a comparable clinical outcome without the iterative optimisation procedure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mikroulis et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: