Systematic review shows mixed results of adipose-derived cell therapies on skin quality in aging populations, suggesting the need for standardized protocols and assessments.
Skin aging leads to changes such as dyschromia, rhytids, dermal atrophy, and reduced elasticity. Adipose-derived cell therapies (ADCT), including stromal vascular fraction, (SVF), adipose-derived stem cells (ADSC), and adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AD-MSC), have gained attention for its regenerative potential. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of ADCT in improving skin quality such as elasticity, texture, pigmentation, and rhytid reduction. This systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, with a comprehensive search conducted across PubMed (National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, MD), Embase (Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands), and Scopus (Elsevier). Eligible studies must have assessed skin quality outcomes, such as rhytids, dyschromia, texture, and elasticity. Data on study design, treatment protocols, and outcomes were extracted. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool (Cochrane, London, UK). Meta-analyses were conducted where appropriate. Seventeen studies met inclusion criteria. Rhytid severity decreased with SVF and ADSC-conditioned medium (ADSC-CM), particularly in periorbital and nasolabial regions. However, a meta-analysis of two studies showed non-significant reduction in rhytids (p=0.12, I² = 81%), and melanin index results were inconsistent. Combination therapies (e.g., SVF with laser or PRP) outperformed SVF alone. Heterogeneity in follow-up duration, treatment protocols, and assessment tools limited direct comparisons. ADCT show promise as a minimally invasive approach to enhance skin quality. However, variability across studies limits definitive conclusions. Standardized protocols, objective assessment tools, and long-term follow-up are needed to validate them as a reliable skin rejuvenation therapy. Future research should focus on objective assessment tools and larger sample sizes to establish ADCT as a viable skin rejuvenation therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chon et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: