This review discusses material properties and micro-nano manufacturing in flexible MEMS, suggesting improvements for industrial viability.
As the demand for lightweight and flexible sensing in wearable devices and biocompatible devices surges, material properties and micro- and nano-processing have become the biggest obstacles to the industrialization of flexible MEMS. This paper compares the advantages and disadvantages of two PI film preparation routes, liquid-phase polymerization and vapor-phase deposition, in terms of temperature compatibility and batch potential, analyzes the trade-offs between thermal robustness, tensile flexibility, and environmental tolerance of PI, PDMS, and liquid-metal interconnect systems, and reviews the challenges of adapting three-dimensional assembly methods, such as low-temperature bonding, self-driven folding, and stacked lithography. Based on case comparisons, this paper proposes three major directions: optimizing the low-temperature speed curing process, constructing multi-physical field simulation models, and improving system-level reliability testing. This work provides a clear and feasible roadmap for realizing flexible MEMS from lab to marketable applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tingjun Xu (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: