Formative research identifies barriers and facilitators for digital health interventions in urban refugee populations, suggesting potential pathways for improvement.
Background Despite advances in addressing child health and undernutrition, low- and middle-income countries in Africa have experienced a persistently high number of children with suboptimal outcomes in the last decade. Caregivers in low-resource settings have limited access to health and nutrition information to enhance child development. Digital interventions are a possible solution, although barriers and enablers for their success among urban, low-income refugee and host communities is unclear. This study sought to explore the perceptions of healthcare workers and caregivers of young children on current health, nutrition, and early child development practices among urban refugee and host communities; to identify barriers and facilitators for suitable digital interventions; and to apply findings to enable intervention design. Methods We conducted a formative study using a qualitative approach which involved key informant interviews (n=12) and focus group discussions (2; n=17) with caregivers of children below two years of age. The key informants included health, nutrition and child development officials from the Ministry of Health, and representatives from community-based organizations. Data were analysed thematically. Results While there were some perceived positive practices among refugee and host communities, they were described by officials as being insufficient, especially around breastfeeding, dietary diversity, ante- and post-natal care and positive parenting. There were limited digital interventions despite increased access to smart phones. Barriers such as access to smart phones and digital literacy were seen as likely to hinder uptake of digital interventions. However, use of existing resources such as community health promoters were seen as facilitators of intervention uptake. The findings from the formative study were mapped to intervention decision making. Conclusion The findings from this study indicate potential for digital solutions. They also make an important contribution to designing effective, contextually appropriate, and sustainable digital interventions which have a higher likelihood of being accepted within the community.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marangu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: