Online study shows writing interventions affected emotional processing in adults with rejection sensitivity, suggesting key benefits for psychological health.
Abstract Objectives Social rejection presents emotional challenges that can impact psychological health. Writing interventions that promote regulation strategies in response to stress, such as self-compassion and detached reappraisal, have shown promise in fostering resilience and adaptive coping. This study aims to evaluate whether self-compassion and detached reappraisal writing interventions following rejection are associated with emotional and psychological processing, reflected in linguistic patterns, particularly among individuals experiencing increased psychological symptoms. Method 166 adult participants with elevated levels of rejection sensitivity were recruited for an online study. They completed psychological symptom measures, were prompted to recall an experience of social rejection, and then were randomized to self-compassion, detached reappraisal or neutral writing conditions regarding the rejection experience. Results Intervention condition predicted distinct linguistic patterns. Self-compassion was associated with more cognitive processing (p < .001) compared to detached reappraisal, while detached reappraisal was associated with more psychological distancing (p < .001) compared to control. More severe psychological symptoms (e.g., depression and anxiety) were associated with more negative emotion word use in the control group, but this effect was attenuated in the self-compassion (p < .05) and reappraisal groups (p < .05). Findings suggest that brief writing interventions can buffer symptom-linked emotional expression through distinct language-based mechanisms. Conclusions These findings highlight the potential of brief writing interventions to serve as scalable, low-intensity tools for promoting adaptive emotional processing and mitigating the expressive impact of psychological distress. Pre-registration The study was pre-registered https://osf.io/8cykq/?view_only=b13a60626a684bfba56faa9d2adf3dea
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Snodgrass et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: