Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Qualitative analysis of health professionals' insights on prediabetes management in rural settings, indicating areas for improving diagnosis and prevention programs.
Background People with prediabetes are at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes; therefore, diagnosing and managing this condition is critical. This qualitative study aimed to explore perspectives of health professionals with experience in prediabetes management in a rural setting about prediabetes diagnostic and management practices, to inform recommendations to improve type 2 diabetes prevention strategies and programs. Methods The study adopted a critical realist methodology. Nineteen health professionals from northern New South Wales, Australia, who were responsible for diagnosing and/or managing people with prediabetes were interviewed. Data were thematically analysed using a critical realist lens, then context–mechanism–outcome statements were generated and confirmed by co-authors using a discussion and reflection process. Results Five themes were generated from the semi-structured interviews: (1) the diagnostic dilemma; (2) care coordination and referral processes; (3) diabetes ‘waiting room’; (4) the spectrum of prediabetes management; and (5) blueprint for type 2 diabetes prevention. Conclusions Prediabetes is a complex condition requiring diagnosis and management by a multidisciplinary team of health professionals to delay and/or prevent progression to type 2 diabetes. Establishing clear roles and responsibilities for diagnosing and managing prediabetes, and development of strategies to improve referral to and engagement in type 2 diabetes prevention programs will improve prediabetes care and diabetes prevention in rural settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McMullen et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: