Retrospective study compares stone-free rates and safety of two ureteral access sheaths in patients with upper ureteral stones, indicating a preference for the larger access sheath.
Objective This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of two tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheaths (TFS-UAS), 12/14Fr (Group A) and 10/12Fr (Group B), combined with a 7.5Fr flexible ureteroscope (f-URS) for treating upper ureteral and renal stones. Methods A retrospective analysis of 168 patients undergoing retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) was conducted. Group A ( n = 76) used a 12/14Fr TFS-UAS, while Group B ( n = 92) used a 10/12Fr TFS-UAS. Primary outcomes included stone-free rates (SFR) (Grade I: ≤2 mm; Grade II: ≤4 mm fragments), operative times, and complications. Results Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. Group A demonstrated significantly shorter operation (72.5 vs. 78.5 min, P < 0.05) and lithotripsy durations (57.5 vs. 64.5 min, P < 0.05). Immediate SFR (Grade I) was higher in Group A (86.8% vs. 71.7%, P = 0.018), but 1-month SFR showed no difference (90.8% vs. 84.4%, P = 0.242). Grade II SFR and complication rates (ureteric injury, fever, sepsis) were similar ( P > 0.05). Conclusion The 12/14Fr TFS-UAS combined with a 7.5Fr f-URS offers superior lithotripsy efficiency and immediate SFR compared to the 10/12Fr variant, while maintaining comparable long-term outcomes and safety. These findings support its clinical preference for RIRS in upper tract calculi.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luo et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: