This research reveals biased signaling in β2-adrenoceptor agonists for asthma, suggesting it may optimize efficacy and safety in treatment.
Drug discovery is a costly and time-intensive process that is often limited by efficacy issues and unforeseen side effects. GPCR-targeting ligands, which account for one-third of marketed drugs, have been shown to exhibit biased signaling and preferential activation of one signaling pathway over another. While designing biased ligands is a recent advancement, their therapeutic benefits remain uncertain. However, the success of existing drugs raises the following question: do they inherently exhibit signaling bias that enhances efficacy or safety? This study examines the signaling profiles of short- and long-acting β2AR agonists (SABAs and LABAs), key treatments for asthma and COPD, using biosensors to measure G protein and β-arrestin coupling. Older SABAs, such as isoprenaline and isoetharine, show minor G protein bias, while newer agents, such as salbutamol, demonstrate significant G protein bias. Among LABAs, salmeterol shows greater G protein bias compared to that of the more balanced formoterol. This shift toward G protein bias over 50 years reflects efforts to improve asthma treatments. The increased bias results from reduced ligand-receptor residence times and weaker receptor-β-arrestin complex formation, contributing to the enhanced efficacy. Despite the potential advantages, a systematic evaluation of signaling bias remains underutilized in drug development. Early-stage, high-throughput tools to assess signaling profiles could improve candidate selection, reduce late-stage failures, and minimize side effects. We advocate for the routine integration of biosensors for quantifying signaling bias, optimizing compound selection, and enhancing therapeutic outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Phan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: