Assessment reveals moderate quality of YouTube videos on eustachian tube dysfunction, highlighting reliability issues in patient education content.
Background: Digital platforms have become significant sources for patients to obtain health information. As a widely used platform, YouTube contains numerous health-related videos; however, the accuracy and reliability of this content are often questioned. Objective: This study aims to assess the quality and reliability of YouTube videos related to Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD). Methods: In this study, 41 YouTube videos on ETD were evaluated using the DISCERN scale by 2 ENT specialists. In addition, the relationship between video parameters and the type of publishing organization (healthcare professional versus non-healthcare), as well as the presence of surgical content, was analyzed. Results: Of the evaluated videos, 53.7% were published by healthcare professionals. The average DISCERN score was 3.96±0.75 (Researcher 1) and 3.97±0.76 (Researcher 2). Videos published by healthcare organizations had significantly higher DISCERN scores than those published by other sources ( P =0.002). Conclusions: YouTube videos on ETD are generally of moderate quality, with those published by healthcare professionals being more reliable. Improving the quality of health-related videos necessitates professional input and guidance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Demir et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: