Systematic review reveals significant association between lichen planus and hepatitis C, suggesting testing for anti-HCV antibodies is advisable.
Several studies have explored the potential association between lichen planus (LP) and chronic hepatitis C (HCV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) related, yielding conflicting results. To determine whether there is an association between these two entities, through a systemic review and meta-analysis. Bibliographic searches were conducted using PubMed and Scopus databases. Data obtained from papers included in the systematic review were put into a quantitative meta-analysis, carried out with SPSS software version (29.0.2.0). Out of the initial pool of 834 studies, 45 studies met the inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. The odds ratio (OR) for HCV-seropositivity in LP patients was 4.55 (95% CI, 3.08-6.74), with higher ORs observed in Mediterranean basin countries (OR: 5.41, 95% CI: 3.16-9.29). In Italy, the OR was 4.42 (95% CI, 1.99-9.81). A regional variation was noted within Italy, with a higher OR in northern Italy-compared to southern Italy. Similar associations were found in Asian countries, with an OR of 4.49 (95% CI, 2.94-6.88). However, in northern Europe, the pooled OR was 0.733 (95% CI, 0.15-3.66), indicating no statistically significant association. When considering subjects with HCV infection, the presence of LP showed a pooled OR of 3.22 (95% CI, 1-10.34). Regarding HBV infection, the OR was 1.51 (95% CI, 1.15-1.97), with no differences and was similar when analyzing different subgroups. Our study indicates a moderate to high risk for HCV in patients with LP, according to geographic region, while the risk remains uncertain for HBV with respective ORs of 4.55 (95% CI, 3.08-6.74) and 1.51 (95% CI, 1.15-1.97). It seems reasonable to test the sera of patients affected by LP for anti-HCV antibodies, while the necessity of testing for HBV remains more uncertain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guida et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: