Prospective study finds oral rehydration therapy improves serum sodium correction in newborns, suggesting a shift in treatment protocols.
ObjectivesThe rehydration approach for hypernatremic dehydration in newborns is challenging. A new treatment protocol was introduced in the NICU for moderate hypernatremic dehydrated (MHD) newborns to achieve safer and more effective serum sodium (Na+) correction.MethodsA prospective study in a four-level NICU examined term and near term MHD (150-169 mEq/L) newborns. In a novel hypernatremic dehydration treatment protocol, 49 newly diagnosed MHD patients were in group 1, while 54 previously treated control MHD patients were in group 2.Results49 neonates received the novel treatment protocol (group 1), and data from 54 neonates were obtained from hospital records (group 2). Serum Na+ correction rate was significantly lower in group 1 compared to group 2, with a median serum Na+ level of 0.66 versus 1.05 mEq/L/h, p = 0.001. The proportion of patients who were treated with pure oral rehydration was significantly higher in group 1 compared to group 2 (67.3% vs 25.9%, p<0.001). Multiple regression analysis was performed to determine factors associated with use of intravenous rehydration: initial serum Na+ [odds ratio (OR):1.515, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17-1.94, p<0.001] and serum uric acid [OR: 1.495, 95% CI 1.092-2.00, p = 0.012] in model 2; belonging to Group 2 [OR: 28.267, 95% CI 10.321-53.69, p<0.001]; each additional delay in the day of postnatal admission [OR: 1.381, 95% CI 1.011-1.888, p = 0.043]; and initial serum Na+ [OR: 1.574, 95% CI 1.216-2.037, p = 0.001] in model 4 were significantly associated with intravenous rehydration.ConclusionsOral rehydration therapy offers slower sodium reduction and has a low treatment failure rate in MHD newborns. It can be the primary treatment approach, while intravenous therapy should be considered based on the patient's overall clinical and biochemical status, not just initial sodium levels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yaprak et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: