Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Review examines pathogen detection improvements using nanotechnology, biosensing, and AI, highlighting their implications for diagnostics.
The rapid and precise detection of pathogenic microbes plays a critical role in the successful diagnosis, management, and containment of infectious diseases. In this review article, we systematically examine the latest technological progress in methodologies for identifying disease-causing microorganisms. These methods are categorized into six major approaches: traditional culture-based techniques, immunological assays, molecular biological methods, metabolic profiling, spectroscopic technologies, and emerging nanotechnology-driven innovations. Moreover, this review offers a comparative assessment of these techniques, shedding light on their underlying mechanisms, strengths, weaknesses, and practical applications in real-world scenarios. This review also discusses the integration of artificial intelligence (AI)-based techniques, paving the way for next-generation pathogen surveillance. In light of the preceding analysis, this review highlights cutting-edge technological developments that could facilitate more efficient, precise, and widely available methods for identifying pathogenic microorganisms. This article is categorized under: Diagnostic Tools > Biosensing Diagnostic Tools > In Vitro Nanoparticle-Based Sensing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jing et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: