Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Phase II trial shows milademetan improves objective response rate and progression-free survival in patients with MDM2-amplified, TP53-wildtype tumors, suggesting potential benefits in targeted therapy.
MDM2 is an E3 ubiquitin ligase that degrades the tumor suppressor p53. In cancers, MDM2 amplification (MDM2amp) leads to overexpression of MDM2, inducing p53 degradation and a p53-null phenotype even in the absence of TP53 mutations. We report here the pre-clinical and clinical activity of milademetan, a potent and selective oral small molecule inhibitor of the MDM2-p53 interaction, in MDM2amp, TP53-wildtype (wt) solid tumors. Milademetan was tested against a variety of cell-line and xenograft tumor models. This supported a phase II basket study (MANTRA-2) in patients with advanced MDM2amp, TP53-wt solid tumors. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), and key secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events. Milademetan showed potent activity against MDM2amp, TP53-wt laboratory models. In the phase II trial, 40 patients received milademetan, of whom 31 had centrally confirmed molecular testing. The best overall response was 19.4% (6/31) with 1 confirmed response (3.2%) and 5 unconfirmed partial responses, including a patient with endometrial stromal sarcoma who achieved 100% target lesion reduction. The median PFS was 3.5 months (95% CI:1.8, 3.7). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events observed included thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, anemia, leukopenia, and diarrhea. Milademetan had a manageable safety profile and achieved responses against a variety of refractory MDM2amp, TP53 -wt solid tumors, but tumor reductions were short-lived. Subsequent MDM2 inhibitor efforts should focus on combination strategies or treatment in earlier lines of therapy to achieve more durable clinical benefit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dumbrava et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: