This approach utilizes unmanned aerial and ground vehicles for precision mapping and reinforcement learning navigation, suggesting improved efficiency in disaster scenarios.
The primary challenge that robots face in disaster rescue is to precisely and efficiently construct disaster maps and achieve autonomous navigation. This paper proposes a method for air–ground collaborative map construction. It utilizes the flight capability of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) to achieve rapid three-dimensional space coverage and complex terrain crossing for rapid and efficient map construction. Meanwhile, it utilizes the stable operation capability of an unmanned ground vehicle (UGV) and the ground detail survey capability to achieve precise map construction. The maps constructed by the two are accurately integrated to obtain precise disaster environment maps. Among them, the map construction and positioning technology is based on the FAST LiDAR–inertial odometry 2 (FAST-LIO2) framework, enabling the robot to achieve precise positioning even in complex environments, thereby obtaining more accurate point cloud maps. Before conducting map fusion, the point cloud is preprocessed first to reduce the density of the point cloud and also minimize the interference of noise and outliers. Subsequently, the coarse and fine registrations of the point clouds are carried out in sequence. The coarse registration is used to reduce the initial pose difference of the two point clouds, which is conducive to the subsequent rapid and efficient fine registration. The coarse registration uses the improved sample consensus initial alignment (SAC-IA) algorithm, which significantly reduces the registration time compared with the traditional SAC-IA algorithm. The precise registration uses the voxelized generalized iterative closest point (VGICP) algorithm. It has a faster registration speed compared with the generalized iterative closest point (GICP) algorithm while ensuring accuracy. In reinforcement learning navigation, we adopted the deep deterministic policy gradient (DDPG) path planning algorithm. Compared with the deep Q-network (DQN) algorithm and the A* algorithm, the DDPG algorithm is more conducive to the robot choosing a better route in a complex and unknown environment, and at the same time, the motion trajectory is smoother. This paper adopts Gazebo simulation. Compared with physical robot operation, it provides a safe, controllable, and cost-effective environment, supports efficient large-scale experiments and algorithm debugging, and also supports flexible sensor simulation and automated verification, thereby optimizing the overall testing process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tao et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: