Numerical simulations demonstrate effective gas drainage in coal seams, implying enhanced safety. Cross-measure boreholes reduce gas pressure and content.
This study addresses gas drainage challenges in the Pingdingshan NO.10 mine JI15-16 coal seam through coupled COMSOL-FLAC3D numerical simulations. The research evaluates the effectiveness of a cross-measure borehole drainage system. It analyzes the failure mechanisms of the surrounding rock in both the machine roadway and floor roadway of the 24130 working face under the influence of boreholes. The results demonstrate that extended drainage duration progressively reduces both gas content and pressure within the borehole-affected zone of the coal seam while enhancing the effective permeability of the JI15-16 coal stratum. The operational system extracted 1,527,357 m3 of methane, achieving a pre-drainage efficiency of 59.18% through cross-measure boreholes. The measured gas content aligns with simulated predictions, though field-recorded gas pressure registered slightly higher than modeled values. This validated drainage design complies with the Pingmei Group’s regulations for coal and gas outburst prevention. Critically, cross-measure boreholes alter stress distribution around both coal and floor roadways, promoting plastic zone expansion. Consequently, during the development of the 24130 working face’s machine roadway, intensified ground pressure monitoring is essential near borehole locations in the roof, floor, and rib strata. Supplementary support reinforcement should be implemented when required to prevent rib spalling and roof collapse incidents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Su et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: