Critical review demonstrates the flawed arguments against Marxian law of profit decline in capitalist economies, suggesting empirical analysis is essential.
This article critiques the theoretical attempts to refute the Marxian law of the tendency of the rate of profit to fall through an analysis of the relationship between technical change and the decline in profitability as formalized by Marx. Focusing on the arguments of the critics, we have divided the latter between those who consider that the law cannot operate due to its ‘indeterminacy’ and those who claim that technical change must increase the rate of profit. In this article, we will demonstrate that these positions are based either on misunderstandings or on theoretical principles that are antithetical to the Marx’s critique of political economy and are therefore not adequate as a refutation of the law of the tendency of the rate of profit to fall. Our final conclusion is that the logical-formal critical approach is unproductive, and that only a more advanced empirical analysis can dictate a verdict on this relationship in capitalist historical development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pablo Fernández Ruiz (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: