Prospective study evaluates BCVA and CST outcomes in DME patients, highlighting treatment patterns in Korea.
To evaluate real-world functional and anatomical outcomes, treatment patterns, and ocular examination trends in diabetic macular edema (DME) in Korea. A prospective, multicenter, observational study was conducted at 17 hospitals (2017-2022) involving adults with DME. Patients were categorized into center-involving (CI DME) and non-center-involving (non-CI DME) groups based on optical coherence tomography findings. Serial changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfoveal thickness (CST), and treatment and examination patterns were recorded at baseline and follow-up visits (6, 12, 18, and 24 months), and analyzed using linear mixed models and paired t-tests. A total of 209 participants (38.8% women; mean age, 60.2±10.8 years) were enrolled. Over 24 months, 10/68 (14.7%) non-CI DME patients developed CI DME. CST significantly decreased in the CI DME group (from 419µm at baseline to 343µm, P=0.001), whereas BCVA remained unchanged in both groups. Throughout the two-year period, the average number of anti-VEGF injections was 3.1±3.6, while steroid injections averaged 0.7±1.5. The CI DME group received significantly more anti-VEGF injections compared to the non-CI DME group (3.8±3.9 vs. 2.0±2.8, P=0.004). Additionally, the CI DME group had more frequent visits (15.8 vs. 11.3, P=0.017) and OCT examinations (9.7 vs. 7.4, P=0.023). The number of anti-VEGF injections decreased in the CI DME group over time, while the number of visits decreased in both groups. In real-world clinical practice in Korea, the treatment and monitoring frequency for DME was lower than in major clinical trials, potentially contributing to suboptimal visual outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: