Timing of invasive coronary angiography in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) remains controversial. Angiographic risk and, hence, myocardium at risk are not necessarily considered in currently used non-ST elevation myocardial infarction management algorithms. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of the SAVE score in NSTE-ACS patients to noninvasively identify patients with high-risk angiographic risk who might benefit from an early invasive strategy. We prospectively assessed 950 consecutive patients admitted to five different hospitals with a diagnosis of NSTE-ACS, 598 (491 male, mean age 63 ± 12 years) of whom were risk-stratified according to the SAVE risk score. The primary endpoint was the identification of high-risk angiographic features. High-risk angiographic features were observed in 347 (58%) (292 male/55 female). SAVE score was significantly higher in patients in the high-risk angiography group compared with patients without high-risk features [6 (4.5-8) ± vs. 4 (2-5.5); P < 0.001]. Using the proposed risk score, 79% (275 out of 347 patients) were correctly identified as having a high angiographic risk, and 58% (145 out of 251 patients with low-risk angiographic features) were also correctly identified by the SAVE score. The SAVE score adequately identified patients with high angiographic risk who may benefit from early invasive management strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chalikias et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: