Safety review highlights the effectiveness of antithrombotic strategies in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, suggesting some combinations may reduce complications.
Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is a viable alternative to anticoagulation for treatment in patients with Non-valvular Atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who cannot tolerate anticoagulation. Post-procedure patients are generally prescribed Oral anticoagulation (OAC) for 45 days while the device is undergoing endothelialization, following which patients are continued on antiplatelet agents. Recommendations for antithrombotic agents following LAAO arrived by consensus which are not tolerated by all patients. This review covers safety profile of antithrombotic therapy options after LAAO. We discuss the side effect profile including Device related thrombosis (DRT), bleeding, and thromboembolic events. The new randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis compared combinations of DOAC with Single Antiplatelet Therapy (SAPT), Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT), VKA or only SAPT and studied the incidence of major bleeding, DRT, and thromboembolic events. The review is a comprehensive summary of different antithrombotic agents' combinations along with the duration recommendations and emphasizes the importance of a discussion amongst involved team members and patients. Patients with NVAF undergoing LAAO, initial postprocedural antithrombotic monotherapy with DOAC is associated with low rates of thromboembolism, DRT and major bleeding followed by DAPT. DAPT is associated with lower incidence of thromboembolic events in comparison to SAPT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sawhney et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: