Analysis reveals how psychological factors predict pain intensity and physical function in injury recovery, indicating therapeutic importance.
This study evaluated the unique incremental predictive value of brief psychological assessments on pain intensity, pain interference, and physical function after musculoskeletal injury. Participants (N=135) completed baseline assessments during hospitalization following a traumatic injury and follow-up data three months later. Predictive assessments were depression, anxiety, traumatic injury distress and pain anxiety, while concurrent assessments included pain acceptance, valued activity, and pain self-efficacy. Regression analyses determined the added explanatory value (ΔR²) of psychological variables beyond pain intensity and medical/injury factors. Follow-up pain intensity, pain interference and physical function were predicted by traumatic injury distress (ΔR²=0.08, P<0.001; ΔR²=0.16, P<0.001; ΔR2=0.05, P=0.003; respectively), and pain anxiety (ΔR²=0.04, P=0.005; ΔR²=0.06, P<0.001; ΔR2=0.04, P=0.006). Pain acceptance was associated with pain interference at three months (ΔR²=0.03, P=0.036). Both pain intensity and interference were associated with valued activity (ΔR²=0.03, P=0.013; ΔR²=0.02, P=0.035) and pain self-efficacy (ΔR²=0.06, P<0.001; ΔR²=0.06, P<0.001). Greater physical function at follow up was associated with less traumatic injury distress (ΔR2=0.03, P=0.024), and greater pain self-efficacy (ΔR2=0.05, P=0.002). Psychological assessments conducted early in recovery offer additional predictive value beyond medical and injury-related factors. These findings underscore the importance of comprehensive psychological evaluations following traumatic injury.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kruger et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: