Research reveals varied voluntary motor command pathology in multiple sclerosis patients, suggesting potential personalized therapies.
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a progressive inflammatory neurodegenerative disease that degrades neural transmission between the brain and spinal alpha-motoneurons. These voluntary motor commands contain excitatory, inhibitory, and neuromodulatory components that must be appropriately balanced for skilled motor control. Unlike other clinical populations, in MS we have no knowledge about how voluntary motor commands are disrupted. MS is a clinically heterogeneous population, with sensorimotor impairments that vary widely and unpredictably across patients. Our overall scientific hypothesis is that the voluntary motor command in the MS population varies accordingly, with multiple "phenotypes" evident. Here, we explore this idea by identifying pathological aspects of the voluntary motor command in 59 participants with MS with a range of sensorimotor symptoms and disability, compared with 38 age-/sex-matched controls. We recorded motor unit discharge from the tibialis anterior and soleus muscles during isometric dorsiflexion/plantarflexion contractions. We then calculated geometric and temporal features in their firing patterns to characterize their excitatory, inhibitory, and neuromodulatory inputs according to a recently developed "reverse engineering" paradigm. MS values for many of our parameters were highly variable, with some participants with abnormally values and others with abnormally low values. In addition to this variability, MS group means for most parameters reflecting the balance of neuromodulation and inhibition were significantly lower than those of controls. These initial findings support the idea that there may be different phenotypes of voluntary motor command pathology among patients with MS, indicating the potential need to personalize the selection of mechanistically targeted rehabilitation therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McPherson et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: