Bibliometric analysis reveals thematic progression in urban flood simulation, highlighting fragmented governance and integration challenges.
Urban flooding presents a growing challenge amid rapid urbanization, climate variability, and fragmented governance. Although simulation and risk assessment tools have advanced considerably, their integration into urban planning remains limited. This study utilized a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of 1293 articles from the Scopus database, selected through a PRISMA-guided workflow, to examine the temporal, structural, and conceptual evolution of simulation, flood risk, and planning in urban flood research from 1980 to 2025. The findings reveal a thematic progression from engineering-centric approaches to broader discourses on resilience, adaptation, and systemic risk. However, disciplinary fragmentation persists, with technical modeling, infrastructure planning, and governance still weakly connected. Despite a shared vocabulary around climate risk and resilience, practical integration into decision-making frameworks remains underdeveloped. The study highlights the need for more cohesive research-practice linkages and calls for frameworks that better align simulation outputs with urban planning imperatives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gamal et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: