An enhanced model improves lane detection accuracy and speed in suburban areas, suggesting better path planning for autonomous vehicles.
Lane detection is a key technology in automatic driving environment perception, and its accuracy directly affects vehicle positioning, path planning, and driving safety. In this study, an enhanced real-time model for lane detection based on an improved DeepLabV3+ architecture is proposed to address the challenges posed by complex dynamic backgrounds and blurred road boundaries in suburban road scenarios. To address the lack of feature correlation in the traditional Atrous Spatial Pyramid Pooling (ASPP) module of the DeepLabV3+ model, we propose an improved LC-DenseASPP module. First, inspired by DenseASPP, the number of dilated convolution layers is reduced from six to three by adopting a dense connection to enhance feature reuse, significantly reducing computational complexity. Second, the convolutional block attention module (CBAM) attention mechanism is embedded after the LC-DenseASPP dilated convolution operation. This effectively improves the model’s ability to focus on key features through the adaptive refinement of channel and spatial attention features. Finally, an image-pooling operation is introduced in the last layer of the LC-DenseASPP to further enhance the ability to capture global context information. DySample is introduced to replace bilinear upsampling in the decoder, ensuring model performance while reducing computational resource consumption. The experimental results show that the model achieves a good balance between segmentation accuracy and computational efficiency, with a mean intersection over union (mIoU) of 95.48% and an inference speed of 128 frames per second (FPS). Additionally, a new lane-detection dataset, SubLane, is constructed to fill the gap in the research field of lane detection in suburban road scenarios.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cui et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: