Machine learning predicts student performance with 97.7% accuracy, suggesting academic and behavioral insights are key.
This paper presents a machine learning framework achieving 97.7% accuracy (R 2 = 0.977) in predicting student performance by integrating academic metrics (e.g., exam scores) with behavioral indicators (question-asking frequency, ChatGPT usage). K-means clustering reveals three distinct student groups with significant performance gaps (49.33 vs. 40.05 average marks). Deployed via a Streamlit interface, the system demon- strates that behavioral features contribute 19.7% additional explanatory power beyond traditional academic data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Udani et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: