Experiments reveal sub-boundary-layer vortex generators improved separation control in transonic flow, indicating new design opportunities.
Experiments are conducted at an inflow Mach number of 1.6 to control a normal shock-induced separation using sub-boundary-layer vortex generators (SBVGs). A steady normal shock is located in the test section using a dual-channel working section arrangement and a variable tunnel second throat. An array of three SBVG configurations, namely, delta ramp, ramp vanes, and rectangular vanes, are tested ahead of the interaction for separation locations of [Formula: see text], 0.46, and 0.51. For all devices, a maximum reduction of 34% in separation is seen for [Formula: see text] with a reduction in [Formula: see text]-shock benefit and a fuller profile close to the near-wall region. Separation control capability, however, becomes more distinct with increasing control distance. At [Formula: see text], a ramp-vane device of height 0.2[Formula: see text] shows enhanced pressure recovery by 1% relative to no control with reasonably good separation control (17%) as well. In terms of separation shock unsteadiness, the peak rms value at [Formula: see text] is the lowest for ramp-vane devices with [Formula: see text]. The current approach of resizing vane chord length and rearranging the SBVGs in the array not only helps to confine separation closer to the near-wall region but also keeps their separation control capability reasonably unaltered with improved pressure recovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Verma et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: