Theoretical analysis reveals how leak size and soil type affect acoustic properties in pipelines, suggesting better detection methods.
To address the difficulty of locating small-hole leaks in buried natural gas pipelines, this study conducted a comprehensive theoretical and numerical analysis of the acoustic characteristics associated with such leakage events. A coupled flow–acoustic simulation framework was developed, integrating gas compressibility via the realizable k-ε and Large Eddy Simulation (LES) turbulence models, the Peng–Robinson equation of state, a broadband noise source model, and the Ffowcs Williams–Hawkings (FW-H) acoustic analogy. The effects of pipeline operating pressure (2–10 MPa), leakage hole diameter (1–6 mm), soil type (sandy, loam, and clay), and leakage orientation on the flow field, acoustic source behavior, and sound field distribution were systematically investigated. The results indicate that the leakage hole size and soil medium exert significant influence on both flow dynamics and acoustic propagation, while the pipeline pressure mainly affects the strength of the acoustic source. The leakage direction was found to have only a minor impact on the overall results. The leakage noise is primarily composed of dipole sources arising from gas–solid interactions and quadrupole sources generated by turbulent flow, with the frequency spectrum concentrated in the low-frequency range of 0–500 Hz. This research elucidates the acoustic characteristics of pipeline leakage under various conditions and provides a theoretical foundation for optimal sensor deployment and accurate localization in buried pipeline leak detection systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cai et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: