Systematic literature review highlights resilience in Industry 5.0, indicating its importance for sustainable development and adaptability during crises.
Purpose: This paper attempts to explore the concept of resilience in the context of Industry 5.0. It is believed that this is the next stage of the industrial revolution of Industry 4.0. The issues addressed are new and little recognized in the literature. The aim of the paper is to examine "resilience in Industry 5.0". Design/methodology/approach: The article uses a systematic literature review method to identify and map key words related to this topic. Findings: The results indicate an ambiguous understanding of the concept of "resilience", but also highlight its key elements. They are common to the problem addressed in the context of Industry 5.0. These include sustainable development and human focus. The synergy between technology and people is associated with the need to adapt to changing market and crisis conditions. Research limitations/implications: they concern the scientific works that were used to review the literature and scientific databases, the initial stage of development of the Industry 5.0 concept and the theoretical nature of the work. Practical implications: Resilience in the context of Industry 5.0 is the least recognized pillar of this concept. The analysis indicates not only the directions of development of enterprises, but also the need to adapt employees, structures, resources and production systems in the event of a crisis. Social implications: Knowledge of the topic of resilience does not only concern industry. The issue addressed is important in various areas of life. Originality/value: The problem under consideration is relatively little known, mainly in the area of resilience. The mapping shows the development of work related to the problem under consideration in the context of focusing on humans and sustainable development, but also on new technologies. The need for further research has been identified, which can bring benefits to both scientists and practitioners, while promoting all pillars of Industry 5.0. The obtained results of the bibliographic analysis can constitute a knowledge base in the design of elements of production systems in enterprises, be a good example for decision-makers or the community. They can provide a background for discussions and polemics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Katarzyna Szara (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: