This analysis reveals improved accuracy in node importance assessments for power systems, indicating the effectiveness of the electrical LLS algorithm.
As power grids continue to expand in scale, the occurrence of cascading failures within them can lead to significant economic losses. Therefore, assessing the criticality of grid nodes is crucial for ensuring the secure and stable operation of power systems and for mitigating losses when cascading failures occur. The classical Local Link Similarity (LLS) algorithm in complex networks evaluates the importance of network nodes from a neighborhood topology perspective, but it suffers from issues such as the excessive weighting of node degrees and the neglect of electrical parameters. Based on the classical algorithm, this paper first develops the Improved Local Link Similarity (ILLS) algorithm by substituting alternative similarity metrics and comparatively evaluating their performance. Building upon the ILLS, we then propose the Electrical LLS (ELLS) algorithm by integrating node power flow and electrical coupling connectivity as multiplicative factors, with optimal combinations determined via simulation experiments. Compared to classical approaches, ELLS demonstrates superior adaptability to power grid contexts and delivers enhanced accuracy in power system node importance assessments. These algorithms are applied to rank the node importance in the IEEE 300-bus system. Their performance is evaluated using the loss-of-load-size metric, comparing ELLS, ILLS, and the classical algorithm. The results demonstrate that under the loss-of-load-size metric, the ELLS algorithm achieves approximately 25% higher accuracy compared to both the ILLS and the classical algorithm, validating its effectiveness.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: