This study examines cognitive linguistic metaphors of darkness and light in Turkic languages and English, suggesting cultural influences reshape understanding.
Metaphors of darkness and light are among the most entrenched conceptual structures through which speakers of many languages construe knowledge, emotion, morality and social order. Drawing on Cognitive Linguistics, this study provides a contrastive examination of English and three Turkic languages (Turkish, Uzbek and Kazakh), asking whether the same image‐schematic oppositions underlie their discourse and how far culture reshapes the universal experiential basis. A 4.5-million-word balanced corpus of modern newspaper prose, fiction and academic writing in each language was queried for lexical items meaning “dark-/black-” and “light/bright/white” together with common collocates. Every concordance line was coded for source–target mappings according to Conceptual Metaphor Theory and statistically compared across languages. Qualitative close readings complemented the counts to expose culturally salient extensions such as divine illumination in Sufi Uzbek verse or socio-moral “whiteness” in Kazakh proverbial speech. Results reveal a stable cognitive template in which LIGHT indexes knowledge, moral approval and vitality whereas DARKNESS indexes ignorance, danger and emotional gravity, yet each language foregrounds different sub-domains and narrative frames. English displays a rational-secular orientation (“to shed light on a problem”), Turkish accentuates socio-political solidarity (“karanlık güçler” ‘dark forces’ for anti-democratic powers) and Uzbek preserves religious connotations (“nur topmoq” ‘to find light’ = receive divine guidance). These findings confirm that bodily experience grounds the metaphors but local history and ideology orchestrate their discursive salience. Pedagogically, explicit awareness of such metaphors can aid translation, intercultural pragmatics and vocabulary teaching in Turkic-English contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Urakova Hulkar Abdumalikovna (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: