Assessment reveals high microbial loads and antimicrobial resistance in nile tilapia, indicating urgent hygiene improvements.
This study evaluated microbiological risks along the Nile tilapia ( Oreochromis niloticus ) fish value chain in Kakamega County, Kenya, by assessing microbial loads, pathogen prevalence, and antimicrobial resistance to determine food safety and hygiene standards. Significant variations in microbial counts were observed along the chain, with the highest total plate count (TPC) (8.73 ± 2.06 log 10 CFU/g) and total coliform count (TCC) (7.91 ± 1.97 log 10 CFU/g) recorded at the wholesale stage, suggesting that postharvest handling practices contribute to increased contamination. In contrast, processing methods such as drying and frying reduced these counts significantly, with values of 4.12 ± 0.97 and 4.39 ± 1.05 log 10 CFU/g, respectively. All water samples and contact surface swabs tested positive for coliforms, with levels ranging from 4.96 ± 1.29 to 6.77 ± 1.94 log 10 CFU/100 mL for water samples and 4.63 ± 3.32 to 3.69 ± 1.93 log 10 CFU/cm 2 for contact surfaces, thereby exceeding the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines and indicating poor water quality and inadequate sanitation management. Among the pathogens, Staphylococcus aureus was most prevalent in fish (94.4%) and water (71.2%), followed by Pseudomonas spp. (65.6% and 45.6%) and Escherichia coli (64.8% and 60%). High contamination at farm level, evidenced by a 93% prevalence of S. aureus in fish, suggests that unhygienic harvesting practices are a primary source of contamination. Moreover, antimicrobial susceptibility testing revealed high resistance to ampicillin (75%) and erythromycin (58%), with multidrug resistance among key isolates. Overall, these findings underscore the urgent need for enhanced hygiene practices, improved water quality management, stricter antimicrobial policies to safeguard public health, and ensure the safety of tilapia fish products.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Obar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: