Analysis demonstrates the importance of elastohydrodynamic lubrication on fatigue life in cylindrical roller bearings, suggesting that lubricant properties significantly impact performance.
Cylindrical roller bearings are widely used in industrial machinery, automotive systems, and aerospace applications, where their reliability directly affects the performance and safety of mechanical systems. The fatigue life of cylindrical roller bearings is significantly affected by their elastohydrodynamic lubrication condition, with variations potentially reaching multiple times. However, conventional quasi-static models often neglect lubrication effects. This study establishes a quasi-static analysis model for cylindrical roller bearings that incorporates the effects of elastohydrodynamic lubrication by integrating elastohydrodynamic lubrication theory with the Lundberg–Palmgren life model. The isothermal line contact elastohydrodynamic lubrication equations are solved using the multigrid method, and the contact load distribution is determined through nonlinear iterative techniques to calculate bearing fatigue life. Taking the N324 support bearing on the main shaft of an SFW250-8/850 horizontal hydro-generator as an example, the influences of radial load, inner race speed, and lubricant viscosity on fatigue life are comparatively analyzed. Experimental validation is conducted under both light-load and heavy-load operating conditions. The results demonstrate that elastohydrodynamic lubrication markedly increases contact loads, leading to a reduced predicted fatigue life compared with that of the De Mul model (which ignores lubrication). The proposed lubrication-integrated model achieves an average deviation of 5.3% from the experimental data, representing a 16.1% improvement in prediction accuracy over the De Mul model. Additionally, increased rotational speed and lubricant viscosity accelerate fatigue life degradation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: