Comparison reveals dimensional stability variances in dental casts with different base designs and storage conditions, indicating optimal configurations for usage.
To compare the dimensional stability of dentate, maxillary, bio-based resin casts with various base designs and storage conditions to that of casts in a dental resin. Dentate maxillary casts with either solid or hollow bases were additively manufactured using liquid crystal display technology from reference design files using a soy-based (EX), a corn-based (FD), and a dental cast (KM) resin (N = 20). Each set of casts was divided into two subgroups based on storage conditions (exposed to light or stored in light-proof boxes) (n = 10). Casts were digitized with a laboratory scanner the day after fabrication and weekly for the following four weeks. The scans were superimposed over their respective reference file to calculate region-based (anterior, posterior, entire arch, soft tissue, and entire cast) root mean square (RMS) values. Data were analyzed using a generalized linear model (α = 0.05). The RMS values were affected from the interactions among resin type, base design, and storage condition (P ≤ 0.018). Hollow-based KM casts stored in a light-proof box had the lowest anterior, posterior, and entire arch RMS, and mostly had lower overall RMS (P < 0.001). Hollow-based FD casts exposed to light mostly had lower soft tissue RMS (P ≤ 0.019). Hollow-based KM casts stored in a light-proof box mostly had higher dimensional stability. However, the deviations observed across all casts remained within previously reported clinically acceptable thresholds for diagnostic and orthodontic applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dönmez et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: