Experimental framework reveals visual differences in gloss perceptions under varied surface contexts.
Gloss is typically considered the perceptual counterpart of a surface's reflectance characteristics. Yet, asking how discriminable two surfaces are on the basis of surface properties is a poorly posed question, as scene factors other than reflectance can have substantial effects on how discriminable two glossy surfaces are to humans. This difficulty with predicting gloss discrimination has so far hobbled efforts to establish a perceptual standard for surface gloss. Here, we propose an experimental framework for making this problem tractable, starting from the premise that any perceptual standard of gloss discrimination must account for how distal scene variables influence the statistics of proximal image data. With this goal in mind, we rendered a large set of images in which shape, illumination, viewpoint, and surface roughness were varied. For each combination of viewing conditions, a fixed difference in surface roughness was used to create a pair of images showing the same object (from the same viewpoint and under the same lighting) with high and low gloss. Human participants (N = 150) completed a paired comparisons task in which they were required to select image pairs with the largest apparent gloss difference. Importantly, rankings of the scenes derived from these judgments represent differences in perceived gloss independent of physical reflectance. We find that these rankings are remarkably consistent across participants, and are well-predicted by a straightforward Visual Differences Predictor (Daly, 1992; Mantiuk, Hammou, & Hanji, 2023). This allows us to estimate bounds on visual discriminability for a given surface across a wide range of viewing conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheeseman et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: