PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 14, 2025European Journal of Preventive Cardiology18 citationsOpen Access

Cardiovascular risk factors management in older adults: a clinical consensus statement from the European Association of Preventive Cardiology of the ESC and the ESC Council for Cardiology Practice

View Full Paper
RPRoberto F.E. PedrettiRARiccardo AsteggianoAGAndreas B. Gevaert

Key Points

  • A tailored approach to managing cardiovascular risk factors improves outcomes in older adults with CVD.
  • Incidence of cardiovascular disease risk factors significantly rises with age, particularly hypertension and diabetes.
  • This clinical consensus document reviews existing evidence, pointing to the need for intensive risk factor management.
  • Focus on practical, evidence-based recommendations to better address cardiovascular care in older populations.

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) currently ranks first in global mortality and morbidity and its prevalence increases with age. The most common risk factors for CVD are hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidaemias, adipositas, smoking, and physical inactivity, Also, depression, anaemia and frailty can be considered important risk factors for CVD. Incidence and prevalence of risk factors and comorbidities increase with age. Nevertheless, risk factor management in older adults and how intensively they should be treated are challenging for cardiovascular specialists and other clinicians, and an intensive and individual approach is needed, given the limited evidence available to date. Therefore, in this clinical consensus document from the European Association of Preventive Cardiology of ESC and ESC Council for Cardiology Practice, a modern reappraisal of the evidence on the field is provided, together with simple, practical, and feasible suggestions to achieve the best goal in the clinical setting, focusing on evidence-based concepts.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pedretti et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68a363510a429f797332a50chttps://doi.org/10.1093/eurjpc/zwaf175
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper