Observational analysis reveals minimal global mean cooling from forestation in CMIP6 models, indicating biogeophysical effects might override carbon cycle benefits.
Forestation may reduce temperatures by lowering atmospheric CO 2 . However, biogeophysical changes from forestation may weaken this cooling. We use twelve Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) models to quantify the biogeochemical (carbon cycle) and biogeophysical (non-carbon cycle) effects of net forestation, as quantified as the difference between the end of two future scenarios: ssp370-ssp126Lu and ssp370. Biogeochemical effects have an inferred global multi-model mean cooling (−0.08 ± 0.02 K). Changes in fires have no significant effect on land carbon storage globally. In contrast with studies indicating biogeophysical impacts counteract biogeochemical impacts by up to 50%, we find that biogeophysical effects lead to insignificant global mean cooling (−0.002 ± 0.041 K). Tropical land shows cooling (−0.058 ± 0.058 K) with eight of twelve models indicating cooling, consistent with prior studies. Using the Surface Energy Balance Decomposition, we find cooling is primarily from increased evapotranspiration and decreased downwelling solar radiation related to clouds and aerosols.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gomez et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: