Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cohort expansion study identified safety and pharmacokinetics of enoblituzumab in children with relapsed tumors, implying alternative targets may be needed.
Purpose:This multi-center, phase 1, cohort expansion study was performed to characterize the safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, immunogenicity and preliminary anti-tumor activity of enoblituzumab in children with relapsed/refractory tumors expressing B7-H3 above a predetermined threshold. Patients and Methods:Samples from 101 patients were screened for B7-H3 expression. Twenty-five patients were enrolled with a median age of 14.8 years (range 6 – 24 years). Enoblituzumab was administered IV weekly at 10 or 15 mg/kg. Serum concentrations of enoblituzumab were monitored using a quantitative sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Pharmacokinetic model building and evaluation was conducted using NONMEM Version 7 level 4 and followed standard model building approaches to define the structure, intersubject variability, and covariate dependence of the model. Safety assessments were performed on all patients who received >/= 1 dose of enoblituzumab. Disease assessment occurred after the eighth enoblituzumab infusion and every 8 weeks thereafter. Results: B7-H3 expression was documented in 96% of evaluable tumors. The maximum administered dose of enoblituzumab was the protocol-specified maximum dose of 15 mg/kg. The main toxicities encountered were infusion-related reactions including fever, chills, hypotension and rash. Pharmacokinetic studies showed that drug plasma concentrations fit a linear 2 compartment model with a mean elimination half-life of 67 days. No objective tumor responses were documented. Conclusions:B7-H3 is expressed on a high proportion of pediatric solid tumors. While enoblituzumab could be safely administered at a weekly dose of 15 mg/kg, no objective tumor responses were observed. Alternative strategies to target B7-H3 in children with relapsed solid tumors should be considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
DeSantes et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: