Randomized trial reports systemic B7-H3 CAR T cells are tolerable with limited activity in refractory solid tumors, suggesting robust cell expansion is critical for tumor regression.
PURPOSE B7-H3 is an immunoregulatory protein overexpressed by many pediatric solid tumors with limited expression on critical organs, making it an attractive immunotherapy target. We present a first-in-human phase I clinical trial systemically administered B7-H3 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells for young patients with relapsed or refractory solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were enrolled onto a phase I trial to examine the safety of B7-H3–specific CARs at various dose levels (DLs) using a standard 3 + 3 dose escalation design. RESULTS Sixteen patients (range, 11-24 years; median, 18.5 years) were enrolled, and nine were treated at DL1 (0.5 × 10 6 CAR T cells/kg; n = 3) or DL2 (1 × 10 6 CAR T cells/kg; n = 6). There were no first infusion dose-limiting toxicities. Maximum first-infusion circulating CAR T cells detected in the peripheral blood were 4.98 cells/μL (range, 0-4.98 cells/μL) with detection of CAR T cells colocalizing with tumor cells at the site of metastatic disease in one patient. Patients were eligible for subsequent infusions. An objective partial response by PERCIST criteria was observed 28 days after a second CAR T cell infusion in a patient who did not have an objective response after the first infusion. The second infusion demonstrated marked enhancement of CAR T cell expansion to 1,590 cells/μL and was accompanied by cytokine release syndrome and dose-limiting transaminitis. Detailed peripheral blood cytokine profiling revealed elevated IL-21 levels preinfusion 2 compared with infusion 1. CONCLUSION B7-H3 CAR T cells are tolerable and demonstrate limited antitumor activity without acute on-target, off-tumor toxicity. High levels of CAR T cell expansion may be necessary to achieve objective responses, but undefined host and tumor microenvironment factors appear to be critical (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04483778 ).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pinto et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: