Retrospective cohort analysis highlights that combined high stress hyperglycemia ratio and low hemoglobin-to-RDW ratio significantly predict worse outcomes in stroke patients, indicating their potential utility.
High stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR) and low hemoglobin-to-red blood cell distribution width ratio (HB/RDW) are each known predictors of mortality in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). This study aimed to assess the predictive performance of high SHR (≥1.18) and low HB/RDW (≤0.76) together in stroke patients treated with thrombolysis. We retrospectively collected data from 345 AIS patients treated with thrombolysis. HB/RDW values were obtained from pre-recombinant tissue plasminogen activator complete blood counts; while fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels were measured in the morning after an 8-14-hour overnight fast. Patients were categorized into four groups based on SHR and HB/RDW levels. We used multivariable Poisson regression with robust variance to estimate risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Models assessed associations with in-hospital mortality (IHM), early neurological deterioration (END), and functional outcomes at discharge and 3 months, adjusting for age, sex, prior stroke, pre-existing disability, myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and malignancy. Propensity score weighting analysis was further conducted as a sensitivity analysis. Among 345 patients, only 37 were in the high SHR (SHR+) and low HB/RDW (HB/RDW+) group. A total of 65 patients (18.8%) died during hospitalization. The SHR+ HB/RDW+ group had significantly higher risks of IHM (adjusted RR: 9.97, 95% CI: 4.95-20.08), END (adjusted RR: 2.95, 95% CI: 1.51-5.77), 3-month mortality (adjusted RR: 6.23, 95% CI: 3.49-11.12), and poor 3-month functional outcomes (adjusted RR: 2.86, 95% CI: 2.01-4.06) compared to the SHR- HB/RDW- group. These associations remained robust across sensitivity analyses. The combination of SHR ≥1.18 and HB/RDW ≤0.76 predicted IHM with an AuROC of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.73-0.83). Although the combined biomarker improved sensitivity and net benefit, its AUROC was not statistically superior to that of individual markers. Combined high SHR and low HB/RDW levels at admission significantly predict poor outcomes in thrombolysis-treated AIS, performing better than either biomarker alone. Further validation in larger, diverse cohorts is warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krongsut et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: