Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Observational analysis found MammaPrint predicts chemotherapy benefit in early breast cancer, indicating its clinical utility in treatment decisions.
Gene expression assays help personalize adjuvant chemotherapy decisions for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative (HR+HER2-) early breast cancer (EBC). The 70-gene risk of distant-recurrence signature, MammaPrint, demonstrated clinical utility in guiding chemotherapy de-escalation in genomically Low Risk patients in the MINDACT trial. This study evaluates MammaPrint as a continuous predictor of chemotherapy benefit in HR+HER2- EBC using Real-World Data (RWD) from the FLEX Registry. The study evaluated 1,002 patients treated with endocrine therapy (ET) only or ET with chemotherapy (ET+CT) enrolled in FLEX (NCT03053193) with 5-year median follow-up. Propensity-score matching balanced treatment groups by menopausal status, T-stage, and nodal-status. The primary endpoint was Distant Recurrence-Free Interval (DRFI). Regression and Cox proportional hazards models assessed chemotherapy benefit across MammaPrint Index (MPI) Risk. Most patients were post-menopausal (70.1%), node-negative (70.0%), and had grade-2 tumors (51.2%). The regression models showed that MPI strongly predicted 5-year DRFI in ET only (R2=0.99, p < 0.001) and ET+CT (R2=0.90, p < 0.001) groups, corresponding to an average absolute chemotherapy benefit of 5.6% in High 1 and 10.9% in High 2. Minimal improvement in DRFI with chemotherapy was observed for Low (1.7%) and UltraLow (<1.0%) Risk groups. A multivariate Cox model with an MPI-by-treatment interaction term demonstrated that increasing MPI Risk was associated with greater chemotherapy benefit on DRFI (HR = 0.15, p = 0.047). Chemotherapy benefit was significantly associated with pre-menopausal status, but not age, T-stage, nodal-status, or grade. These RWD from the FLEX Registry demonstrate that MPI is predictive of both DRFI prognosis and chemotherapy benefit in HR+HER2- EBC. (NCT03053193).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brufsky et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: